Yogyakarta, June, 4 2026 — A public lecture featuring Min Seong Kim was held on Thursday, June 4, from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. in Room 205 of the Poerbatjaraka Building. On this occasion, Kim delivered a presentation entitled “Trembling Grounds of the Archipelago: Pluriversal Ontopolitics and More-than-Human Antagonism,” a study that reexamines the foundational assumptions of pluriversal politics through ecological and political experiences emerging across the Indonesian archipelago.

In his presentation, Kim addressed ongoing debates surrounding pluriversal politics that have recently gained prominence within environmental studies, decolonial thought, and posthumanist scholarship. As articulated by a number of contemporary thinkers, pluriversal politics seeks to challenge the modern worldview that separates humans from nature and treats the world as an object to be mastered and controlled. Instead, this perspective emphasizes that life is constituted through networks of interdependent relations among humans and a wide range of nonhuman entities, including animals, plants, landscapes, and the material forces of the earth.

According to Kim, pluriversal politics is generally grounded in the assumption that relationality constitutes the ontological basis of life. From this perspective, politics is understood as the effort to establish and sustain relationships that enable diverse forms of existence to coexist. However, Kim questioned whether relationality can truly serve as an adequate foundation for understanding political dynamics, particularly when confronted with conflict, tension, and division that cannot always be resolved through reconciliation and relational repair.

To develop this critique, Kim drew on the works of Adam Bobbette and Sophie Chao, whose research explores various forms of human–nonhuman relations in Indonesia. The cases they examine demonstrate that interconnectedness among beings does not necessarily produce harmony. Rather, such relations are often marked by frictions, competing interests, and forms of instability that reveal the political dimensions of the more-than-human world. The presence of nonhuman actors in politics, therefore, not only creates possibilities for collaboration and relationality but also gives rise to antagonisms that shape social and ecological fields.

Building on this reading, Kim connected the question of more-than-human politics to the tradition of post-foundational political thought, particularly the concept of antagonism developed by Ernesto Laclau. Within this framework, antagonism refers to the condition that no social order can ever be fully complete, final, or free from conflict. Every attempt to establish order inevitably encounters something that cannot be fully integrated into the existing system. Politics, therefore, is never simply a matter of creating relationships; it must also contend with the limits, tensions, and forms of negativity that accompany every mode of collective existence.

Through this analysis, Kim proposed that conflict and negativity should occupy a more central place in discussions of pluriversalism. Rather than treating relationality as a pre-given foundation, he argued that collective life—whether among humans or between humans and nonhumans—is always shaped through processes of negotiation, struggle, and antagonism that can never be entirely eliminated.

The public lecture offered a critical perspective on contemporary developments in political theory and ecological thought while opening a space for reflection on how societies understand their relationship with a world that extends beyond the human. At a time of growing concern over ecological crises and interspecies relations, Kim’s presentation provided a compelling framework for understanding conflict, tension, and uncertainty as inseparable dimensions of political life itself.

Author: Khotibul Umam

On the afternoon of March 12, 2026, at the Department of Anthropology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Dr. Gaffari Rahmadian invited the Master’s class Paradoxes of Market and Development to examine the relationship between humans and non-humans in development discourse through a new perspective. Drawing on Giorgio Agamben’s philosophy of potentialities, Dr. Gaffari developed this concept to analyze the relationship between humans and nature within narratives of development.

For many policymakers and corporations, “potential” is a powerful term often paired with promises of job creation, increased foreign exchange, and economic progress. However, through Agamben’s lens, Dr. Gaffari challenged this logic. Potential, he argued, is not something static or merely a “resource waiting to be extracted.”

“Potential is a capacity or force—present in both objects and humans—that has not yet been realized into something actual,” he explained. He further emphasized that potential also includes the capacity not to realize itself. This is where true freedom lies—when communities possess potential yet refuse to be governed by systems that seek to exploit it, that is where they are genuinely free.

After the presentation, the classroom atmosphere became more dynamic. Graduate students immersed themselves in a deep discussion, unpacking various real-world cases and connecting Agamben’s theoretical framework with the socio-political realities they observe.

Author : Daiva Keefe
Photo : Dr. Des Christy

Archaeology students took part in a field study for the Environmental Archaeology course at Candi Ijo on April 11, 2026. This activity aimed to introduce students to the relationship between archaeological remains and the surrounding environment, including aspects such as landscape, topography, and spatial use. Through direct observation and hands-on practice on site, students were able to understand how natural conditions are connected to human activities in the past.

Drs. Jarwo Susetyo Edy Yuwono, M.Sc., the course lecturer, also accompanied the field study. With this guidance, students were able to apply the knowledge they had learned in class in a real-world setting. In addition to providing practical experience, the field study helped strengthen students’ observation and analytical skills within the context of field-based archaeological research.

Author: Jovinka Aldinova Kiranamurti
Photo: Muhammad Irsyad

Yogyakarta, April 19, 2026 – The Faculty of Cultural Sciences at Universitas Gadjah Mada (FIB UGM) held the first session of the Professorial Forum titled “Humanities for Governance and Social Transformation: Language, Literature, and Policy Politics.” This academic forum reviewed several proposals and research plans from academics that addressed various strategic issues, ranging from the dynamics of political legitimacy and customary land conflicts to the urgency of forensic linguistics in law enforcement.

The Vice Dean for Research, Community Service, and Alumni at FIB UGM, Dr. Mimi Savitri, emphasized that the theme of this forum aligned with the faculty’s research roadmap. She encouraged researchers to formulate their proposed studies into strategic recommendations for future policymakers.

“The goal is to determine how existing research can be recommended as policy briefs. We hope FIB can make a significant contribution,” said Dr. Savitri during her opening remarks.

She added that the forum intentionally invited doctoral students to motivate them and provide a concrete overview of how to draft a dissertation research proposal.

Moving into the presentation session, Professor Bambang Hudayana presented a research proposal titled “Prophecies on the Legitimacy and Delegitimacy of Indonesian Presidents.” He planned a study to examine how the leadership of Presidents Joko Widodo and Prabowo Subianto intersects with narratives of political prophecies or divine mandates (wangsit) on social media. Through this proposal, Professor Hudayana intends to combine the concept of Javanese power cosmology with networked religion theory. This research plan will explore how political prophecies express the spiritual hopes of the public while also serving as a symbolic instrument to either legitimize or delegitimize the power of leaders.

In the second presentation, Dr. Nur Aini Setiawati reviewed a draft book titled “Customary Land in Indonesia: Policy Politics and the Dynamics of Agrarian Conflict in the 20th Century.” This book draft seeks to bridge normative legal studies and social movement studies regarding agrarian conflicts. Dr. Setiawati explained that agrarian disputes are essentially a clash of two perspectives. There is the communal understanding of society, which views land as a generational living space, colliding with the state’s view of land as a legal and administrative object. Therefore, this book draft will uncover the history of state policy formation and its social consequences at the local level, which frequently trigger the loss of community access to customary territories.

The third presentation featured a linguistic perspective from Professor I Dewa Putu Wijana through a research plan titled “Linguistics and Forensic Linguistics.” He designed this study to respond to social interactions in the digital era, which often give rise to disharmony and verbal abuse. The research plan emphasizes that as public legal awareness increases, forensic linguistics will take on a central role. This applied linguistics approach is projected to resolve various cases of language-based crimes by utilizing branches of linguistics such as phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, and sociolinguistics.

The various drafts of academic works originating from this forum demonstrate the strong commitment of the humanities in formulating a foundation for solving societal problems. Thorough research planning related to language, culture, and history is highly essential for establishing equitable public governance. Ultimately, the effort to prepare this humanity-based research is expected to help reduce inequalities in living spaces, create an ethical communication climate, and encourage the development of more peaceful and resilient social institutions for the future.

[Public Relations of FIB UGM, Candra Solihin]

On Friday (November 21, 2025), Prof. Dr. Pujo Semedi served as a panel discussant in the session “Monsters, Devils, and Survival: The Persistence of Plantations and People in the Scholarship of Pujo Semedi” at the 2025 Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association (AAA) in New Orleans, LA, supported by FULLBRIGHT funding through the Scholar in Residence Grant at the University of Colorado Boulder for Fall 2025. The panel was inspired by Pujo’s academic work on plantations, which investigates how colonial hegemony in its efforts to build capital accumulation by sacrificing human sociality has instead resulted in the loss of assets and weakened capacities for survival. In his presentation, Pujo invited participants to explore how non-human entities such as “ghosts” influence social and material relations within plantation environments.

Through ethnographic research in Kalimantan’s palm oil plantations, Java’s tea plantations, and Germany’s vineyards, Pujo argues that “ghosts” are understood as empirical and material realities by plantation communities. Although spiritual beings are not bound by physical laws or fixed forms, belief in them becomes a productive lens for ethical and emic understanding. Positioned within a strong postcolonial perspective, Pujo’s ideas are seen as important for advancing research on extraction and imperial accumulation in postcolonial nations. The panel, featuring Carla Jones and five PhD students from the University of Colorado Boulder, embodied efforts to decolonize knowledge, highlighting Pujo Semedi’s role in fostering cross-cultural academic collaboration.

Author: Penulis: Okky Chandra Baskoro