Yogyakarta — The findings of the tracer study and the graduate user satisfaction survey serve as the basis for evaluating and improving the quality of learning in the Master’s Program in Literary Studies, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM). The evaluation results are used to inform curriculum reviews, annual activity planning, and efforts to strengthen graduate competencies so that they remain aligned with the needs and developments of the labor market.

The evaluation draws on five data sources: the UGM Tracer Studies conducted in 2023, 2024, 2025, and 2026, as well as the Graduate User Satisfaction Survey administered by the Master’s Program in Literary Studies. The data cover graduates from various graduation years and responses from 43 supervisors or organizations employing the graduates.

Tracer study data are collected periodically from graduates. The findings are then analyzed and discussed at program meetings involving lecturers responsible for relevant courses to identify aspects of learning that should be maintained or improved.

Relatively Short Job Search Period

One of the key findings indicates that graduates of UGM’s Master’s Program in Literary Studies generally experience a relatively short waiting period before securing employment. Based on data for graduates from 2022–2024, the average waiting period ranged from 2.6 to 3 months.

The proportion of graduates who secured employment within six months of graduation also showed an upward trend, increasing from 80 percent among the 2022 graduates to 89 percent among the 2024 graduates. Most respondents had already been employed before completing their studies. This reflects the characteristics of master’s students, many of whom already have work experience while pursuing their degrees.

The data also show positive developments in the alignment between graduates’ fields of employment and their fields of study. Among the 2024 graduates, 74 percent of respondents reported a high level of alignment, up from 59 percent among the 2023 graduates. Meanwhile, the proportion of graduates reporting low alignment decreased from 14 percent to 5 percent.

These developments are consistent with efforts to strengthen interest-based elective courses introduced in the latest curriculum. Nevertheless, the relationship between curriculum changes and the improved alignment of graduates’ fields of employment with their fields of study needs to be further examined through evaluations in subsequent periods.

Strengthening Applied Skills and Foreign Language Proficiency

In addition to mapping graduates’ employment outcomes, the tracer study evaluates proficiency in 25 competencies at graduation and at the time of the survey. The results indicate that several competencies still require attention, particularly data analytics, project management, negotiation, the ability to work under pressure, and time management.

Some of these competencies showed relatively limited improvement after graduates completed their studies. For example, proficiency in data analytics increased only slightly, from 3.91 to 3.96 on a five-point scale. Meanwhile, the project management score remained unchanged at 4.09.

English proficiency is another area that needs to be strengthened. Graduates rated their English proficiency at 4.13 upon graduation, increasing to 4.16 at the time of the survey.

These findings are consistent with the results of the Graduate User Satisfaction Survey. Of the seven competency areas assessed, foreign language proficiency received the lowest proportion of “very good” ratings, at 67.44 percent. Conversely, personal development received the highest proportion of “very good” ratings, at 93.02 percent.

Although all areas received either “good” or “very good” ratings, with no “poor” ratings recorded, this gap has become one of the considerations guiding the program’s efforts to strengthen foreign language instruction, particularly English.

Experiential Learning as an Area of Focus

The tracer study also reveals a difference in emphasis between classroom-based and experiential learning methods. Discussions received the highest score, at 4.66, followed by lectures at 4.45. Experiential learning methods received lower scores, with internships scoring 2.80, practical sessions 3.11, and fieldwork 3.18.

The relatively limited emphasis on experiential learning has become an area of concern because it relates to the need to strengthen applied and managerial competencies. In response to these findings, the program plans to involve students in lecturers’ research projects and in organizing academic events, incorporate project management components into methodology courses, and introduce data processing tools in research methods classes.

The program also plans to establish structured fieldwork activities through courses on oral tradition studies and philology. In addition, it will explore partnerships with cultural institutions and publishing organizations to expand opportunities for students to gain practical experience.

Expanding Career Information and Alumni Networks

Regarding the transition into the workforce, the 2026 Tracer Study identified limited access to job vacancy information as the most frequently reported obstacle. Of the 39 respondents who answered this question, 28.21 percent cited limited job vacancy information as a barrier. Another 23.08 percent reported a lack of job opportunities specifically targeted at graduates of the program.

Other obstacles included insufficient work experience, reported by 17.95 percent of respondents. Meanwhile, 15.38 percent stated that they had encountered no difficulties in finding employment.

These findings have prompted the program to improve access to career information and professional networks. Planned follow-up measures include establishing information channels for job vacancies and further study scholarships, regularly organizing alumni experience-sharing forums, and introducing graduate profiles to cultural institutions, publishing organizations, and partner universities.

On the other hand, the most widely reported benefit of the program was improved critical thinking and decision-making skills, as reported by 29 of the 49 respondents. Other benefits included greater ease in obtaining or creating employment opportunities, reported by 11 respondents, and opportunities to pursue further studies, reported by 10 respondents.

These findings indicate that the value of education in the Master’s Program in Literary Studies extends beyond employment opportunities to include intellectual development and enhanced decision-making capabilities.

Periodic Evaluation as a Basis for Improvement

Based on the overall findings, the Master’s Program in Literary Studies has established several improvement priorities, including strengthening foreign language proficiency, enhancing applied and managerial competencies, expanding experiential learning, strengthening academic advising, and improving access to career information and alumni networks.

Efforts to strengthen foreign language proficiency will include incorporating more primary reading materials in foreign languages into theoretical courses, requiring final assignments for compulsory courses to be written in English, and providing guidance on English-language article writing before students begin preparing their theses.

Meanwhile, academic advising from the first semester will be strengthened to help students select courses and determine thesis topics that align with their career plans. This measure is expected to further improve the alignment between graduates’ fields of study and their employment.

The implementation of these improvements will be monitored through subsequent tracer studies and graduate user satisfaction surveys. The program has also acknowledged several data limitations, including annual respondent numbers ranging from 35 to 49, the absence of information on graduates’ graduation years in the graduate user satisfaction survey, and the use of self-reported assessments of competency levels.

By making regular use of tracer study findings, UGM’s Master’s Program in Literary Studies seeks to ensure that learning evaluation goes beyond data collection and leads to measurable improvement measures. The evaluation results are expected to support improvements in learning quality while strengthening the relevance of graduate competencies to labor market needs and developments in the field of literary studies.

By: Khotibul Umam

Stefani Adelia Tiurma Mukti from the Department of Archaeology at Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM), in collaboration with Fadel Ilham Dzulkarnain from the Multimedia Engineering Technology program at Politeknik Elektronika Negeri Surabaya (PENS), has introduced an innovative framework for cultural heritage preservation. Presenting at the interdisciplinary iCAST-SS 2026 conference held in Surabaya on October 9–10, 2026, the duo unveiled their research titled “From Prediction to Preservation: An Explainable AI and WebGIS Framework for Simulated Archaeological Heritage Conservation in Trowulan, Indonesia.” Their study focuses on the historical Trowulan site in East Java, a vital zone containing the grand remains of the ancient Majapahit Kingdom, proposing a digitally simulated approach to its ongoing conservation planning.

This interdisciplinary research merges Explainable AI (XAI) and Web-based Geographic Information Systems (WebGIS) to transform conventional archaeological mapping into transparent and precise spatial predictive models. By utilizing Explainable AI, the framework ensures that machine learning predictions are fully interpretable, giving experts clear insights into the environmental and historical factors driving the model’s outputs. Simultaneously, the WebGIS platform serves as an accessible digital interface that visualizes spatial analysis in real time. This synergy successfully bridges the gap between traditional archaeological spatial context and advanced computational data handling, offering a highly communicative tool for heritage management.

Although currently structured around a simulated environment, this pioneering research opens up new avenues for modernizing cultural site management across Indonesia. The findings set the foundation for future field validation and algorithmic refinements, aiming toward real-world applications that can assist policymakers and conservationists in making data-driven decisions. Through their participation in iCAST-SS 2026, Stefani and Fadel demonstrate the powerful potential of cross-disciplinary collaboration—uniting the humanities with technology—to effectively address the complex challenges of preserving cultural heritage in the modern era.

Author : Muhammad Irsyad
Photo Credits: Stefani Adelia Tiurma Mukti

Depok, 5–6 October 2026 — The Indonesian Association of Postgraduate Linguistics Programs (Perkumpulan Program Pascasarjana Linguistik Indonesia, PROPLI) held a meeting on 5–6 October 2026 at the Toety Herati Noerhadi Auditorium, R.M. Ng. Poerbatjaraka Building, Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Indonesia, Depok. The meeting addressed key issues concerning the strengthening of the association and the development and alignment of postgraduate linguistics curricula across Indonesia.

The meeting opened with a report by PROPLI Chair Dr. Triaswarin Sutanarihesti, who outlined the organization’s development since its establishment in 2018. The association was initially founded at Universitas Gadjah Mada under the name APMALI (Asosiasi Program Studi Magister Linguistik Seluruh Indonesia), with Prof. Suhandano as its chair. In 2024, a change in leadership coincided with a change of name to PROPLI. Its membership was subsequently expanded to include doctoral programs in linguistics, in addition to master’s programs.

One of the main agenda items was the process of obtaining a notarial deed for the association. The session featured notary Fatma, S.H., M.Kn., M.H., and was moderated by Dr. Triaswarin Sutanarihesti. The discussion aimed to ensure that the administrative and institutional requirements for the association’s formal establishment were properly addressed.

PROPLI also discussed restructuring its organizational leadership, including the positions of chair, vice chair, supervisory board, treasurer, secretary, and supporting divisions. The association’s assets, currently recorded at IDR 33 million, were also discussed as part of its organizational administration.

The meeting further addressed the graduate profile for master’s programs in linguistics in Indonesia. PROPLI recommended that graduates be qualified as language experts, with competencies aligned with Level 8 of Indonesia’s National Qualifications Framework (Kerangka Kualifikasi Nasional Indonesia, KKNI) and the National Standards for Higher Education (SN-Dikti).

Aligning Postgraduate Linguistics Curricula

The next session focused on aligning curricula with the latest higher education regulations. The session featured Prof. Dr. Made Sri Setyawati, M.Hum., and Prof. Oktavianus, and was moderated by Dr. Putu Pramania Adnyana.

The discussion covered several key considerations in curriculum development: the focus and workload of study programs, curriculum structure and competency matrices, flexibility and updated learning materials, and support for research.

The meeting noted that the minimum study load for master’s programs is governed by Minister of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology Regulation No. 39 of 2025 on Higher Education Quality Assurance, as well as UGM’s internal regulations: Rector Regulation No. 23 of 2024 on Education and Rector Regulation No. 19 of 2025, which amends the earlier regulation. Under the provisions discussed, master’s programs must comprise at least 36 semester credit units (SKS).

Beyond credit requirements, participants discussed how to balance core competencies with the distinctive academic strengths of individual universities. The core curriculum is expected to establish a shared set of competencies, while each university may retain distinctive elements that reflect its academic profile and areas of strength.

The discussion also highlighted the importance of ensuring continuity in learning outcomes across degree levels. Master’s students in linguistics, for example, are expected to develop a sound understanding of microlinguistics, including phonology, morphology, syntax, and semantics, as well as one area of macrolinguistics relevant to their field of study.

Differences in expected competencies at each degree level were also discussed. Undergraduate programs emphasize descriptive skills, master’s programs focus on explanatory skills, and doctoral programs are expected to develop both explanatory and discovery-oriented capabilities. Participants also emphasized the need to distinguish course titles across bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral programs to reflect their respective levels of competency. For example, a bachelor’s program may offer Introduction to Semantics, while a master’s program may offer Advanced Semantics.

The curriculum discussion also covered different modes of postgraduate study, including research-based programs (by research), coursework-based programs (by course), and Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL). Curriculum development is expected to respond to the needs of postgraduate linguistics education while preserving the academic distinctiveness of each university.

The PROPLI meeting brought together representatives of postgraduate linguistics programs from various universities to discuss institutional development and the future direction of linguistics education in Indonesia. The outcomes of these discussions are expected to inform further efforts to strengthen the association and align postgraduate linguistics curricula across the country.

Author: Master’s Program in Linguistics

The Indonesian Language and Literature Study Program at the Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada (FIB UGM), in collaboration with the Art Conservation Study Program at the Indonesian Institute of the Arts (ISI) Yogyakarta, the Yogyakarta Philosophical Axis Area Management Agency (BPKSF), and Technische Universität (TU) Wien, Austria, organized a workshop titled “From Tugu to Panggung Krapyak: Storytelling about Yogyakarta’s Philosophical Axis for Children” on September 1–2, 2026. Held in Room 709, Soegondo Building, FIB UGM, this event aimed to introduce the cultural heritage values of Yogyakarta’s Philosophical Axis to children through creative and interactive storytelling.

The workshop featured speakers from all four collaborating institutions: Dr. Novi Siti Kussuji Indrastuti, M.Hum., Head of the Indonesian Language and Literature Study Program at FIB UGM; Dr. Prima Dona Hapsari, M.Hum., Head of the Art Conservation Study Program at ISI Yogyakarta; Nano Warsono, M.Sn., from ISI Yogyakarta; Drs. Aryanto Hendro Suprantoro, Head of the Yogyakarta Philosophical Axis Area Management Agency; and Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Ulrike Herbig from TU Wien, Austria. This collaboration brought together perspectives in literature, art, cultural heritage management, and academic studies to develop culturally appropriate ways of conveying cultural values tailored to children.

Yogyakarta’s Philosophical Axis consists not only of historical buildings and areas but also embodies philosophical values and cultural knowledge that are vital to pass down to future generations. Through storytelling, these values are transformed into narratives closely aligned with children’s experiences. Characters, fairy tales, wayang (puppetry), songs, and games can be utilized as media to help children recognize and understand the meaning of Yogyakarta’s Philosophical Axis in an engaging way.

During this workshop, children’s literature students from the Indonesian Language and Literature Study Program at FIB UGM were involved in story development and storytelling practices. Meanwhile, students from the Art Conservation Study Program at ISI Yogyakarta contributed by developing properties and interactive visual media to support the storytelling. This activity served as a practical space for students to develop creative approaches in introducing cultural heritage to children.

The series of activities continued with an exhibition during the JWHF agenda on September 29, 2026, in front of the Yogyakarta City DPRD Building. Students from the Indonesian Language and Literature Study Program at FIB UGM actively assisted and manned the exhibition booth, introducing Yogyakarta’s Philosophical Axis through live oral storytelling to visitors. This direct oral presentation served as an effective way to bring the philosophical and historical values of the Philosophical Axis closer to the public in an interesting and easily digestible manner. Student involvement in this initiative also supports cultural heritage preservation efforts through youth participation.

This collaboration aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), specifically SDG 4 on Quality Education through the development of creative and inclusive cultural learning, and SDG 17 on Partnerships for the Goals through cooperation between universities and cultural heritage management institutions.

Author: Indonesian Language and Culture