Yogyakarta – An online academic discussion jointly organized by Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM) and Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Malaysia once again provided a platform for students to deepen their understanding of Arabic language and literary studies. Led by Dr. Nur Kholid, M.P., a lecturer in the Arabic Literature Program at Universitas Gadjah Mada, the session offered an interactive discussion on metaphor and linguistic analysis. During the online meeting, participants explored the concepts of musyabbah and musyabbah bih, focusing on how meaning is constructed through comparisons expressed either explicitly or implicitly. Dr. Kholid presented the material in a systematic manner by analyzing a variety of examples, enabling students not only to understand linguistic structures but also to appreciate the deeper meanings and interpretations embedded in Arabic texts.

Throughout the discussion, students examined several examples of metaphor, including the comparison of soldiers to lions in battle, tears to pearls, and spring as a symbol of human happiness. These illustrations helped participants understand how Arabic employs figurative language to convey meaning in a more vivid, meaningful, and contextual way.In addition to metaphor, the discussion expanded to the interpretation of word meanings in Arabic. The diverse perspectives shared during the session demonstrated that linguistic analysis is not limited to a single interpretation but is open to various analytical approaches and viewpoints. This approach encouraged students to broaden their perspectives while strengthening their understanding of Arabic linguistics and literary studies.

Overall, the discussion was conducted smoothly in an engaging and interactive atmosphere. Students actively participated throughout the discussion and question-and-answer session, reflecting their enthusiasm for the topic. Through this academic activity, participants are expected to enhance their understanding of Arabic studies while further developing their linguistic and analytical skills.

Author: Indana Zulfa

JAKARTA – Academics from Gadjah Mada University (UGM) have once again achieved a prestigious milestone on the national stage. Fitrilya Anjarsari, a doctoral student in the Humanities at UGM, was officially named First Prize Winner of the Jakarta Arts Council (DKJ) 2026 Literary Criticism Competition. The announcement was made during the “2026 DKJ Literary Criticism Contest Awards Night,” which took place in a solemn ceremony at the Small Theater Building, Taman Ismail Marzuki, on July 23, 2026.

Fitrilya succeeded in outshining 141 other entries that had passed the administrative screening with her essay titled “The Collapse of Humanity as the Center: Post-Human Tendencies in Contemporary Indonesian Literary Aesthetics.” This victory is not only a source of personal pride but also reflects the depth of intellectual tradition and the sharpness of critical analysis fostered within UGM’s doctoral program.

This year’s contest is held under the overarching theme “The Long Journey of Indonesian Literature.” Fadjriah Nurdiarsih, Chair of the DKJ Literature Committee, explained that this event represents a consistent effort to foster a healthy ecosystem of thought and scholarly tradition. Since its inception in 2007, this competition has served as a vital platform for the emergence of new literary critics capable of offering fresh perspectives on the development of literature.

In his remarks, DKJ Executive Chair Bambang Prihadi emphasized that literary criticism acts as a bridge, enabling works of art to be discussed and appreciated more deeply by the general public. In line with this, Harry Sanjaya, Head of the Management Unit of the Jakarta Arts Center Taman Ismail Marzuki (UPPKJ TIM), stated that a vibrant tradition of criticism is the foundation for the nation’s cultural progress.

The manuscript written by Fitrilya Anjarsari caught the jury’s attention for its bold exploration of post-humanism in Indonesian literature after the year 2000. In the jury’s statement, read by Areispine Dymussaga Miraviori and Asep Subhan, Fitrilya’s work was deemed capable of transcending conventional readings that typically focus on the human subject.

Fitrilya employs cutting-edge references to analyze four literary works as her subject matter, namely:
1. O (2016) by Eka Kurniawan;
2. Semua Ikan di Langit (2017) by Ziggy Zezsyazeoviennazabrizkie;
3. Aroma Karsa (2018) by Dee Lestari;
4. Gentayangan: Pilih Sendiri Petualangan Sepatu Merahmu (2017) by Intan Paramaditha.

In her analysis, Fitrilya demonstrates how non-human elements in these novels are no longer merely background or supplementary elements, but have transformed into story drivers with agency (both material and non-material). The author skillfully weaves together theoretical foundations and formal analysis using simple language that maintains a rigorous scientific structure through the division of subsections, which enhances overall readability.

The judging process was conducted via “blind reading,” in which the judges evaluated the manuscript without knowing the author’s identity or regional origin. This ensures objectivity in determining the winner based on craftsmanship, readability, and the novelty of the arguments.

Although named the winner, the judging panel still provided critical feedback as part of a healthy academic tradition. The judges highlighted the opening section of Fitrilya’s manuscript, where she presented various humanistic trends in the interpretation of contemporary literary works as the basis for her argument. According to the judges, this section lacked concrete examples, leaving room for doubt as to whether these trends actually exist within the current critical landscape or are merely the author’s imagination.

However, these shortcomings were offset by Fitrilya’s keen ability to weave narrative elements into a highly compelling contextual interpretation. The judges concluded that Fitrilya’s manuscript is a highly versatile work that demonstrates the skill of a master reader in charting a new direction for Indonesian literary aesthetics.

Fitrilya Anjarsari’s first-place victory, followed by Cindy Wijaya (2nd place) and Ridwanul Hakim Authonul Muther (3rd place), demonstrates the dominance of the younger generation on the national literary criticism scene. Bambang Prihadi noted that the majority of this year’s contest participants were from the millennial and Gen Z generations, proving that the critical thinking skills of Indonesia’s youth remain strong.

As a doctoral student in the Humanities at UGM, Fitrilya’s achievement serves as tangible proof of the university’s academic community’s contribution to charting a new course for literary studies beyond the ivory tower of academia. This essay will be published on tengara.id, a literary criticism website operated by the DKJ Literature Committee, so that it can be widely accessed by the public and other researchers.

The awards ceremony concluded with the hope that the winners would continue to inspire critical thinking. With this victory, Fitrilya Anjarsari not only took home a tangible award but also solidified her position as one of the future critics poised to guide “The Long Road of Indonesian Literature” with a sharp and relevant academic perspective.

Penulis: Islahuddin Ibrahim

Sumber dokumentasi:

https://www.youtube.com/live/sJnTES3fXr8?si=ySQ6Kf1tXQDfXq-W 

The Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada, has sent seven students to participate in the 2026 Integrated Archaeological Research of Indonesia (Penelitian Arkeologi Terpadu Indonesia/PATI), organized by the Arsari Djojohadikusumo Foundation (YAD) in collaboration with six archaeology study programs across Indonesia. The program, which will be held from 27 July to 8 August 2026 in Manyarejo Village, the Sangiran Early Man Cultural Heritage Site, Sragen, Central Java, serves as a field-learning and collaborative research program for archaeology students from universities across Indonesia.

Representing the UGM Department of Archaeology are Agatha Kiara Christy and Muhammad Miftah Syafiq in the Archaeology stream, Zeldera Tahani Sifa, Helena Ken Grace Natalie, and Galih Nugroho in the Museum stream, as well as Nur Sulistyaningsih and Sarah Jasmine Kahiking in the Conservation stream. Throughout the program, the students will be accompanied by Dr. Mahirta, M.A., Dr. Fahmi Prihantoro, S.S., M.A., and Dr. Sektiadi, S.S., M.Hum. as academic supervisors from Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Carrying the theme “Unearthing the Cultural Horizon of Sangiran’s Past,” PATI 2026 will focus on rescue excavations, conservation, and the development of an open-air museum model and community-based site management. Through this program, the students are expected to gain hands-on field experience, expand their academic network with archaeology students from other universities, and further strengthen their knowledge and skills in archaeological research and cultural heritage preservation.

Author : Muhammad Irsyad
Photo Credits : Evelyn Warasti

On Thursday, 18 June 2026, the Cultural Anthropology Student Family (KEMANT) of Universitas Gadjah Mada held its annual Hearing Department event in Room 201 of the Poerbatjaraka Building, Faculty of Cultural Sciences (FIB) UGM, Yogyakarta. Running from 1:00 PM to 3:00 PM WIB, the interactive dialogue was hosted by MC [Name] and moderated by Dionysius Nugroho Danumurti. The session was attended by student representatives across various cohorts alongside faculty members, including Agung Wicaksono, Sita Hidayah, Agus Indiyanto, Mubarika Dyah Fitri Nugraheni, Suzie Handajani, Atik Triratnawati, and Elan Lazuardi. The forum served as a communicative platform to gather, review, and address critical student feedback ranging from academic affairs and curriculum management to student organization governance and campus facility availability.

Through a presentation of pre-collected feedback slides, students highlighted several key issues affecting their daily learning environment. Core discussions focused on the disproportionate workload for introductory courses, course quota limitations during course registration (“War KRS”) that disadvantage internal anthropology students, clarity regarding the role and responsiveness of teaching assistants, and the need for greater transparency in grading. In response, the department welcomed the input constructively and committed to using these written recommendations as an official framework to push for policy improvements at both the faculty and university levels. Beyond classroom learning, the department outlined the strategic reasoning behind rescheduling the Integrated Fieldwork (TPL) to mid-year, primarily to mitigate the risks of natural disasters and extreme weather conditions typically affecting research sites toward the end of the year.

In addition to academic topics, the forum addressed physical infrastructure and internal organizational management. Students emphasized the importance of enhancing building accessibility for individuals with disabilities, reconfiguring classrooms to better facilitate group discussions, creating safe and comfortable public spaces, and optimizing place-of-worship facilities within the faculty grounds. Meanwhile, KEMANT officers took the opportunity to present a transparent financial report of the organization’s funds and introduced an updated leadership election mechanism designed to be more democratic, open, and accountable to all members.

The implementation of this participatory forum aligns closely with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) within higher education. First, it directly advances SDG 4 (Quality Education) through a sustained commitment to improving teaching quality, ensuring fair curriculum adjustments, and fostering a conducive learning environment. Second, the emphasis on providing disability-friendly and fully accessible campus facilities reflects a concrete effort to support SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities). Lastly, the hearing embodies SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions) by establishing a transparent, accountable, and responsive institutional governance framework for the entire academic community.

Author: Zayyan Faadia Ayutty

The Master’s Program in Linguistics at Universitas Gadjah Mada, through the Forensic Linguistics course taught by Dr. Sailal Arimi, M.Hum., in collaboration with the Criminal Investigation Unit (Sat Reskrim) of the Malinau Regional Police under the North Kalimantan Regional Police, organized a special technical lecture entitled Writing Expert Witness Examination Reports. The event was held on Thursday, 30 April 2026, in Courtroom 1 of the Faculty of Cultural Sciences at Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

In addition to being attended by the course instructor, who also serves as a language expert, the event was joined by students with an interest in Forensic Linguistics. Student participation aimed to introduce linguistic perspectives into the processes and practices of preparing expert witness statements, including understanding the chronology of legal cases, identifying legal subjects, analyzing language-related criminal complaints, and examining the precision of diction, narrative structure, and ambiguity avoidance in official examination reports (Berita Acara Pemeriksaan or BAP).

The event featured police investigators AIPDA Budi Hermansyah, S.H., and Bripda Abimanyu Akbar, S.H., from the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Malinau Regional Police, along with several graduate students in Linguistics. In their presentation, the investigators explained the distinction between preliminary inquiry (penyelidikan) and formal investigation (penyidikan). They emphasized that expert witness testimony constitutes one form of legal evidence (novum) necessary for bringing a case before the court. They also discussed recent developments in the implementation of Indonesia’s new Criminal Code (KUHP), particularly regarding the expansion of admissible legal evidence. Furthermore, they elaborated on cases commonly handled by investigators, ranging from violations of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) to various forms of fraud, including phishing, scamming, and related cybercrimes.

Dr. Sailal Arimi, M.Hum., explained that “the involvement of students specializing in Forensic Linguistics in this activity represents part of the implementation of teaching alongside research, as well as an effort to strengthen the role of linguistics within the legal domain.” He further noted that this practitioner-based class has been conducted since 2019 for master’s and doctoral students enrolled in forensic linguistics courses.

During the question-and-answer session, students raised various inquiries concerning legal case management procedures, the eligibility of expert witnesses, and the types of cases most frequently encountered. One student participant, Moh. Nawalul Fawaid El Haqi, remarked that “this experience was extremely valuable. We learned that the meaning of a single word in an expert witness examination report can influence the direction of a judge’s decision. At the same time, investigators also learned to view expert testimony as a text that must be constructed on the basis of theoretical linguistic knowledge that we have studied thus far.”

The collaboration between the Master’s Program in Linguistics, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada, and the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Malinau Regional Police represents a pioneering initiative in bridging police science and forensic linguistic analysis. This activity is expected to serve as a collaborative model for handling legal cases across regions—particularly between Kalimantan and Java—while enhancing the quality of investigations through an interdisciplinary approach at the national level.