Pemateri:
Dr.Phil. Dewi Candraningrum

Judul : Ecofeminism

Ruang Sidang 1, jam 08.00-10.00
Selasa, tanggal 09 Juni 2015

[gview file=”https://fib.ugm.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2015/05/Dewi-Candraningrum-Politik-Rahim-Perempuan-Kendeng-Menolak-Tambang-Semen-Kajian-Ekofeminisme.docx”]

[gview file=”https://fib.ugm.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2015/05/1-Dewi-Candraningrum-Mitos-Perempuan-Lereng-Gunung-Merapi-dc.docx”]

[gview file=”https://fib.ugm.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2015/05/UKSW-Dewi-Candraningrum-Amanat-Al-Insan-dalam-Krisis-Lingkungan-Ekofeminisme-Islam-dc-fin.docx”]

[gview file=”https://fib.ugm.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2015/05/CV-Dewi-Candraningrum.doc”]

FIB weekly forum
07 Mei 2015 ; Ruang Sidang 1 FIB UGM
Pukul 13.00

Ethnography, Fieldwork and the Anthropologist’s Emotions –
Challenging ‘Traditional Empiricism’
Thomas Stodulka (Freie Universität Berlin, Germany)

Researchers and their emotions are perceived as an irreconcilable dichotomy. They are considered as nuisances that jeopardize ‘objective’ science. At best, they are regarded as marginal apparitions of limited anecdotic, biographic or artistic interest. Many scientific disciplines have excluded them from their discourse. In contrast, my assumption is that emotions inevitably influence the research process: from the choice of research subjects, the researcher’s positionality and the generation of data, to their interpretation and public representation. We argue that their critical analysis should be part of and not excluded from scientific practice. Instead of obliterating or deeming them as esoteric by-products they should be scrutinized systematically and thus rendered productive for science and the communication of its results to the wider (academic) community.
In particular, fieldwork of anthropologists triggers a range of emotions that impact observation, influence comprehension and guide the formation of theories. Our continued assumption is that fieldwork in its manifold appearances can serve as a paradigm for the researchers’ emotions in general, since only fieldwork creates an extensive corpus of subjective reports (e.g. field diaries, notes, letters) that can be studied exemplarily.
Drawing on examples from my long-term study with street-related adolescents and young adults in Yogyakarta, this talk illustrates that the integration of the ethnographer’s emotions into the analysis, interpretation and representation of ethnographic data can assist in (1) increasing the emotional literacy of ethnographies (2) formulating a more relational anthropological theory and (3) raising emotions to a category of epistemic value.

Dr. Thomas Stodulka’s research focuses on stigma, marginality, and the interplay between culture, emotion, health, and illness. He conducted long-term fieldwork with street-related young men in Yogyakarta, Indonesia between 2001 and 2015, and is currently involved in an interdisciplinary research on cross-cultural perspectives on envy and directs a research project entitled the “The Researchers’ Affects” (http://www.loe.fu-berlin.de/en/affekte-der-forscher)

Address correspondence to him at Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Anthropology, Landoltweg 9-11, 14195 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: thomas.stodulka@fu-berlin.de

Epistimologi Barat dan Memunculkan Epistimologi Indonesia
Pemateri: Al Makin
Pukul 08.00-10.00 ; Selasa, 5 & 19 Mei 2015
di Ruang Sidang 1

Dalam ceramah dan diskusi nanti dibahas tentang dasar-dasar epistimologi (kesadaran ilmu pengetahuan manusia) dari tradisi kuno yang diwarisi oleh Barat saat ini, dan tradisi epistimologi keindonesiaan (yang masih dalam proses pencarian). Maka dalam diskusi akan dipaparkan warisan-warisan kuno, dan sejarah tentang pengetahuan dari naskah-naskah kuno, seperti Gilgamesh (Babilonia Sumeria), Borossus (Kaldea), Herodotus (Yunani), Pliny the Elder (Roma) dan Ibn Khaldun (Arab). Bagaimana dasar-dasar pengetahuan yang akhirnya diwariskan ke dunia Barat, juga berupa teologi dalam tradisi Eropa maupun Arab, itu bertahan dan memberi inspirasi pengetahuan pada peradaban pengetahuan modern saat ini. Cuplikan-cuplikan teks kuno akan dipaparkan dan sedikit perbandingan dari karya-karya sastra dan historiografi Nusantara (Kakawin Sutasoma, Negara Kertagama, dan Babad Tanah Jawa).

Kebudayaan Perspektif Grammatologi
Pemateri: Muhammad Al-Fayyadl

Abstrak
Konsep “kebudayaan” tidak lagi sama sejak diperkenalkannya “grammatologi” oleh Jacques Derrida pada 1967 melalui teksnya, Of Grammatology. Apa itu grammatologi, dan hal apa yang dibawa sains ini bagi kebudayaan dan kajian kebudayaan, akan menjadi pembahasan dalam diskusi ini, yang sekaligus merupakan suatu pengerjaan ulang (reworking)
terhadap beberapa pemikiran pascastrukturalis, di mana “grammatologi” salah satunya, dalam diskursus kebudayaan hari ini.

9 April 2015 ; Ruang Pimpinan FIB UGM
Pukul 13.00

Ekranisasi: Adapting Novels to the Silver Screen in Indonesia (1926-2014)

Pemateri:
Chris Woodrich